BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//206.188.193.176//NONSGML kigkonsult.se iCalcreator 2.16.1//
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:NOFAS
X-WR-CALDESC:National Organization on Fetal Alcohol Syndrome
X-FROM-URL:http://www.nofas.org
X-WR-TIMEZONE:America/New_York
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/New_York
X-LIC-LOCATION:America/New_York
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20131103T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20140309T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:http://034d009.netsolhost.com/nofasdev/?post_type=ai1ec_event&#038\;p=1
 244&#038\;instance_id=
DTSTAMP:20130411T050529Z
CONTACT:
DESCRIPTION:<p>On October 26\, 2010\, the State of Arizona executed Jeffrey
  Landrigan. This was after the United States Supreme Court lifted a lower 
 court’s stay of execution. Among the issues the Court considered in that c
 ase was whether Landrigan was entitled to a new sentencing hearing because
  his attorney failed to present any evidence in mitigation\, despite the y
 oung man’s diagnosis of Fetal Alcohol Syndrome. Justice Clarence Thomas\, 
 who wrote the majority opinion\, stated that the mitigating evidence Landr
 igan sought to introduce\, i.e. evidence of serious organic brain damage a
 ssociated with Fetal Alcohol Syndrome\, “would not have changed the result
 .”2 This was in spite of the fact that Cheryl Hendrix\, the retired Arizon
 a judge who presided over Landrigan’s trial\, submitted a declaration on t
 he defendant’s behalf stating that “Mr. Landrigan would not have been sent
 enced to death\,”3 if she had been given the medical evidence of the defen
 dant’s brain damage and other factors. Some courts say FASD deserves to be
  considered as a mitigating factor\, other courts say it does not\, making
  it a tricky but interesting legal issue. This webinar will explore the br
 ain-based damage that prenatal alcohol exposure causes\, its relationship 
 to high rates of incarceration of youth\, and address its implications for
  adjudicating and sentencing affected children and youth. Presented by Ira
  J. Chasnoff\, MD.</p>
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20120827T151500
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20120827T171500
LOCATION:Online Webinar
SUMMARY:Is FASD a Mitigating Factor in Adjudication and Sentencing?
URL:http://www.nofas.org/ai1ec_event/is-fasd-a-mitigating-factor-in-adjudic
 ation-and-sentencing/?instance_id=
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR